|
-
April 1st, 2005, 04:31 AM
#1
Debating which video card to buy? An excellent guide for the best bang for your bucks
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1780507,00.asp
An excellent article which will tell you which card gives you the best performance per $.
To give you a quick lowdown:
Best performance for fewest dollars spent (AGP)
1. Nvidia GeForce 6600GT 128MB AGP $201
2. ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB $182
Among the higher end cards:
1. ATI Radeon X800 Pro $384
2. Nvidia GeForce 6800GT $372
Best performance for fewest dollars spent (PCIe)
1. GeForce 6600GT 128MB $190
2. Radeon X700 256MB $174
Higher end:
1. ATI Radeon X800 XL $339
If you want more detailed information, you'll have to read the article
-
April 1st, 2005, 05:51 AM
#2
Hi Usil, buddy they say when you become useless at everything else you teach, currently I have an IT class that is doing an intensive course. I am mentor and control (old comp scientist don't die they just smell that way), anyway your post helped quite a few today... so on behalf of the struggling rabble I thank you... BTW the timing was impecable... next week it's wireless networking ... I know we can count on your assistance
-
April 1st, 2005, 06:24 AM
#3
Hey Jenae, thanks for the positive feedback 
I wish I was that clever, but I just quoted the article more or less.
-
July 23rd, 2005, 11:19 AM
#4
 Originally Posted by usil
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1780507,00.asp
An excellent article which will tell you which card gives you the best performance per $.
To give you a quick lowdown:
Best performance for fewest dollars spent (AGP)
1. Nvidia GeForce 6600GT 128MB AGP $201
2. ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB $182
Among the higher end cards:
1. ATI Radeon X800 Pro $384
2. Nvidia GeForce 6800GT $372
Best performance for fewest dollars spent (PCIe)
1. GeForce 6600GT 128MB $190
2. Radeon X700 256MB $174
Higher end:
1. ATI Radeon X800 XL $339
If you want more detailed information, you'll have to read the article 
Why does the Radeon X700 cost less, it has higher ram. I thought higher ram was better. ????
-
July 23rd, 2005, 12:54 PM
#5
Nope not necessarily, a 9200 ATI with 256 RAM gets out performed by a 9500 128mb, its the clock speed that matters, check out the manufacturers website for whatever card you want and there should be a breakdown of specs in a nice comparison chart.
Liam
Desktop:I5 2500K|Asus P8Z68-V|8GB Corsair Vengeance|1280MB Nvidia 560 TI PE|1TB Seagate/60GB OCZ SSD|LG Blu-ray Writer|Corsair 750W
27" iMac:I5 2500S|12GB Crucial DDR3|ATI 1GB 6970|1TB|Superdrive|Mighty Mouse 
-
July 23rd, 2005, 01:39 PM
#6
Or check in the link below: Tom's hardware tests these newer cards, posting benchmarks and fps.
http://www20.graphics.tomshardware.c...004/index.html
-
July 23rd, 2005, 02:47 PM
#7
That ^ but more up to date a think;
http://graphics.tomshardware.com/gra...705/index.html
i bought a 6600gt recently exactly for the bank for your buck it gives u. great card for the money and you can't go wrong with it. made me a happy chap
Windows 7, Asus P5Q-E iP45 , Core 2 Duo E8400, 4GB Ballistix DDR2 800MHz, GeForce 9600.
-
July 23rd, 2005, 03:08 PM
#8
Thanks for link judgejJohn, I hadn't realized Tom's had a new one out.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|