Fired for drinking the wrong beer?
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Fired for drinking the wrong beer?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    675

    Fired for drinking the wrong beer?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Pac-Nor-West-Kent
    Posts
    1,344
    That is a crazy one, but then again, he should have thought that it could be some conflict with the choice he made. Why didn't he just put the beer down for the photo anyway? I would have.

    That's just like being a Cadillac salesman and driving a Lincoln to the job and parking it in front of the Cadillac dealership each day, not right, but some unwritten things you just don't want to do outright. Like keep it, (your personal prefs.), on the backburner, out of sight, and then make your personal choice a private matter not on the record like this guy did.

    Just my view on the issue..
    Tech Talk to me !!!
    Give it UP!!!
    PLEASE???
    ASRock P4VT8+ motherboard
    Intel P4 2.4 ghz processor
    DDR 512 PC2100 RAM x 2 = 1024 MB
    2 WD 40GB JB HDD, with 8mb Cache
    1 Maxtor 60GB HDD ATA 133
    1 Maxtor 80GB HDD ATA 133
    2 Seagate SCSI 18GB 10K 8mb cache HDD
    ATI Radeon 9200SE 128mb Video card
    Onb 10/100 LAN + 3Com 10/100 PCI LAN (added for Network)
    Windows 2000 Server Operating system, (set to be used as day to day OS).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2000
    Posts
    675
    I'm starting to believe in the lottery again.
    I mean, what are the odds?
    Of all the people and all the pics, that one ended up in the paper.
    I used to make a couple business trips to Milwaukee a year and can say that's serious Miller country out there!
    Last edited by Triple7's; February 14th, 2005 at 04:29 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Keizer,Orygun USofA
    Posts
    10,636
    It may be a stretch,,but do you suppose "intoxication" just may have left him 'brain dead'???
    Stupid question? No such thing!
    Virtual Dr. to the rescue!
    Just ask. Bookmark your post for easy reference.
    ==================================

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    sc,united states
    Posts
    3,631
    maybe budweiser will give him a job
    If I Ain't Crappie Fishin', I'm Thinkin' About It

    listen with your eyes---its the only way to believe what you hear...

  6. #6
    Nix's Avatar
    Nix is offline Aka: Nix*, NNiixx, Nix23
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,255
    Do you not have unfair dismissal laws in the US ? (ie in AUS you need to have 3 verbal and 3 written warnings - i think - before you can be sacked from a job).

    Maybe it was because of his bad beret and from the poor quility photo what appears to be chains hanging around his neck making him look some bad a$$ rapper or drug dealer.

    Also on that page was a link to this article about the NHL season being canned http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/4195431/detail.html because of salary agreements ?

    I mean don't NHL players get paid a ton of money ?

    I guess canning the season will hit them in the hip pocket.
    Last edited by Nix; February 14th, 2005 at 09:53 PM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    6,447
    Originally posted by Nix
    Do you not have unfair dismissal laws in the US ? (ie in AUS you need to have 3 verbal and 3 written warnings - i think - before you can be sacked from a job).
    Not really -- most states up there allow for employment "at-will", which means that with a few very specific exceptions (age/gender/race/etc discrimination, whistleblower protection etc) an employee can be terminated at any time for any reason.
    Safe computing is a habit, not a toolkit.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Keizer,Orygun USofA
    Posts
    10,636
    There are some trades that have very strong 'unions' up here. Such as the 'teamsters' union. Employers do 'not' have an easy time firing people who belong to organizations such as these. It takes much more than just a whim to fire these members...
    Stupid question? No such thing!
    Virtual Dr. to the rescue!
    Just ask. Bookmark your post for easy reference.
    ==================================

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    The GREAT STATE of PENNSYLVANIA
    Posts
    849
    The problem as I see it is: Miller and Bud are NOT beer, good anyway.
    Just rap your hands around a YUENGLING LARGER and get off that baby food.

    Upset because he had a different beer and fired him? I think there has to be a lot more to this than that?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Posts
    726
    I think his problem was not in drinking the Bud, but for allowing his picture to be published in the paper with it. (He does have to sign a permission for them to use the photo.)

    Some years ago the HOA where I live employed a groundskeeper who was a baseball fan. He phoned in sick on Padres opening day, and the board president was watching the game to see this idiot being interviewed on tv at the game. He thought getting his mug on tv was a big kick, until he got fired for falsely phoning in sick!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    6,447
    Originally posted by Bill Heffner
    I think his problem was not in drinking the Bud, but for allowing his picture to be published in the paper with it. (He does have to sign a permission for them to use the photo.)
    Then how do paparazzi get their celebrity photos published? If it was an ad for Bud or something then I could see your point, but this was just a photo of random people at a party.
    Safe computing is a habit, not a toolkit.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Posts
    726
    Then how do paparazzi get their celebrity photos published?
    Good question, actually. Maybe there is some sort of implied consent just by being who they are. But I have been with a person who was snapped by a journalist at a ball game and was asked to sign a release so that the paper could use the photo. Maube it was a policy of just that one publication.

    Be that as it may, the guy surely knew that his picture was being taken, and by whom. I find it hard to believe he could not have managed to prevent the use of the picture. Look at his expression: he was delighted to have a news photog shooting him.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •