|
-
February 3rd, 2005, 03:43 AM
#1
-
February 3rd, 2005, 04:04 AM
#2
Ouch!
-
February 3rd, 2005, 05:17 PM
#3
The stupidity of human beings has always amazed me. But what amazes me even more, is that people like to record it. And the lowest link in the chain imho is that people 'like' to watch it...
Stupid question? No such thing!
Virtual Dr. to the rescue!
Just ask. Bookmark your post for easy reference.
==================================
-
February 3rd, 2005, 06:33 PM
#4
But there's big money in it sometimes.
We have a show called Australia's Funniest Home Videos and the grand prize at the end of the series is AUD$250,000 !!!!
-
February 3rd, 2005, 07:19 PM
#5
Yeah well if America's Home video show had been set to music as well as this was perhaps Bob Saget would have done better in the ratings. I think he had more to do with the show's demise than the premise. Anyone remember David Letterman's Stupid Human Tricks? 
To be honest I'm surprised I wasn't censored again when I posted what I have been told by someone, who will remain nameless, that this was too violent.
It never dawned on me VDr was run by Disney.
-
February 3rd, 2005, 07:29 PM
#6
Originally posted by Calpitor
It never dawned on me VDr was run by Disney.
I think it's more to do with the fact that children can visit this site and thus follow links that are inappropriate for them.
-
February 3rd, 2005, 09:53 PM
#7
that children can visit this site
Actually, it's because children do visit this site. Some are members and some are under 13. Would you like your child to see what was posted before Calpitor?
-
February 4th, 2005, 12:01 AM
#8
Originally posted by photolady
Actually, it's because children do visit this site. Some are members and some are under 13. Would you like your child to see what was posted before Calpitor?
Originally posted by Calpitor
To be honest I'm surprised I wasn't censored again when I posted what I have been told by someone, who will remain nameless, that this was too violent.
It never dawned on me VDr was run by Disney.
I was referring to this post, none other.
-
February 4th, 2005, 12:28 AM
#9
Ok point taken. I just wanted you to realize the potential was there for younger more influential children being able to see these posts, sites they wouldn't normally see.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|