changing cluster size???
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: changing cluster size???

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288

    changing cluster size???

    i have changed the cluster size on all my partitions except the OS partition. i was just wondering if there is any program that would allow me to change the cluster size before the HDD boots. like a program u can run from a floppy?

    i have tried partiton magic 8 and i keep getting error 717 and i cant find anythign about that, and i tried apragon hard disk manager and it doesnt aloow u to boot from a floppy
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

  2. #2
    DrMDJ is offline Virtual PC Specialist!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    8,428
    That error tends to indicate that PM ran in to some problem reading the partition table in sector one of the disc. In particular this can indicate that entries for your partitions in the table may show an overlap (ie. the define ranges on the disk of two or more of your partitions overlap), which shouldn't be. You might try running (from dos) the Partinfo utility that comes with PM to see what it says.
    Please remember to post back whether your problem is resolved or
    not, so that others may gain from the knowledge.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288
    so basically some of the clusters "leaked" onto another partition? if so i did notice that after i would format a partition, there would be about 2-4 MB in use and i thought that was kinda strange. i will run the partinfo in a bit and post back what it says
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288
    ok booted with the rescue disk and before it got a chance to start it said that the HDD was over the 1024 sector limit (or something i cant rmemebr exactly) because it was and extended partition and not an ExtendedX. it fixed that. what does that mean? and i did manage to change the cluster size on C:. Is it not possible to format the os partition to 64K? i formatted it to 32K but would like 64. i know its a waste of space but i have plenty of space and am going for the best performance. also i checked for errors on all the partitions using PArtition magic and no errors were found at all. here is all the info from partinfo




    PowerQuest PartitionInfo 8.0 -- Windows NT/2000 Version
    Date Generated: 11/14/04 08:29:47
    Copyright (c)1994-2002, PowerQuest Corporation
    Permission is granted for this utility to be freely copied so long
    as it is not modified in any way. All other rights are reserved.

    PowerQuest, makers of PartitionMagic(r), Drive Image(tm), and DriveCopy(tm), can be reached at:
    Voice: 801-437-8900
    Fax: 801-226-8941
    Web site: http://www.powerquest.com/support/
    E-mail: [email protected]

    General System Information:
    Total Physical Memory (bytes): 535,609,344
    Used Physical Memory: (bytes): 291,454,976
    Maximum Page File Size: (bytes): 1,041,285,120
    Current Page File Size: (bytes): 180,097,024



    ===========================================================================================================
    Disk Geometry Information for Disk 1: 7473 Cylinders, 255 Heads, 63 Sectors/Track
    System PartSect # Boot BCyl Head Sect FS ECyl Head Sect StartSect NumSects
    ===========================================================================================================
    0 0 80 0 1 1 07 1019 254 63 63 16,386,237
    0 1 00 1020 0 1 0F 1023 254 63 16,386,300 103,667,445
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    0 1 00 1020 0 1 0F 7472 254 63 16386300 103667445
    16,386,300 0 00 1020 1 1 07 1023 254 63 16,386,363 21,735,882
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    16386300 0 00 1020 1 1 07 2372 254 63 16386363 21735882
    16,386,300 1 00 1023 0 1 05 1023 254 63 38,122,245 36,869,175
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    16386300 1 00 2373 0 1 05 4667 254 63 38122245 36869175
    38,122,245 0 00 1023 1 1 07 1023 254 63 38,122,308 36,869,112
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    38122245 0 00 2373 1 1 07 4667 254 63 38122308 36869112
    38,122,245 1 00 1023 0 1 05 1023 254 63 74,991,420 4,096,575
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    38122245 1 00 4668 0 1 05 4922 254 63 74991420 4096575
    74,991,420 0 00 1023 1 1 07 1023 254 63 74,991,483 4,096,512
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    74991420 0 00 4668 1 1 07 4922 254 63 74991483 4096512
    74,991,420 1 00 1023 0 1 05 1023 254 63 79,087,995 36,869,175
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    74991420 1 00 4923 0 1 05 7217 254 63 79087995 36869175
    79,087,995 0 00 1023 1 1 07 1023 254 63 79,088,058 36,869,112
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    79087995 0 00 4923 1 1 07 7217 254 63 79088058 36869112
    79,087,995 1 00 1023 0 1 05 1023 254 63 115,957,170 4,096,575
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    79087995 1 00 7218 0 1 05 7472 254 63 115957170 4096575
    115,957,170 0 00 1023 1 1 07 1023 254 63 115,957,233 4,096,512
    Info: Begin C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Info: End C,H,S values were large drive placeholders.
    Actual values are:
    115957170 0 00 7218 1 1 07 7472 254 63 115957233 4096512



    ===========================================================================================================
    Partition Information for Disk 1: 58,620.0 Megabytes
    Volume PartType Status Size MB PartSect # StartSect TotalSects
    ===========================================================================================================
    C: NTFS Pri,Boot 8,001.1 0 0 63 16,386,237
    ExtendedX Pri 50,618.9 0 1 16,386,300 103,667,445
    EPBR Log 10,613.3 None -- 16,386,300 21,735,945
    D: NTFS Log 10,613.2 16,386,300 0 16,386,363 21,735,882
    EPBR Log 18,002.5 16,386,300 1 38,122,245 36,869,175
    E: NTFS Log 18,002.5 38,122,245 0 38,122,308 36,869,112
    EPBR Log 2,000.3 38,122,245 1 74,991,420 4,096,575
    F: NTFS Log 2,000.3 74,991,420 0 74,991,483 4,096,512
    EPBR Log 18,002.5 74,991,420 1 79,087,995 36,869,175
    G: NTFS Log 18,002.5 79,087,995 0 79,088,058 36,869,112
    EPBR Log 2,000.3 79,087,995 1 115,957,170 4,096,575
    H: NTFS Log 2,000.3 115,957,170 0 115,957,233 4,096,512


    ===========================================================================================================
    Boot Record for drive C: (Drive: 1, Starting sector: 63, Type: NTFS)
    ===========================================================================================================
    1. Jump: EB 52 90
    2. OEM Name: NTFS
    3. Bytes per Sector: 512
    4. Sectors per Cluster: 64
    5. Reserved Sectors: 0
    6. Number of FATs: 0
    7. Root Dir Entries: 0
    8. Total Sectors: 0
    9. Media Descriptor: 0xF8
    10. Sectors per FAT: 0
    11. Sectors per Track: 63 (0x3F)
    12. Number of Heads: 255 (0xFF)
    13. Hidden Sectors: 63 (0x3F)
    14. Total Sectors (>32MB): 0 (0x0)
    15. Unused: 0x80008000
    16. Total NTFS Sectors: 16386176
    17. MFT Start Cluster: 65537
    18. MFT Mirror Start Clust: 17965
    19. Clusters per FRS: 246
    20. Clusters per Index Blk: 244
    21. Serial Number: 0x7620E76220E727B7
    22. Checksum: 0 (0x0)
    23. Boot Signature: 0xAA55

    ===========================================================================================================
    Boot Record for drive D: (Drive: 1, Starting sector: 16,386,363, Type: NTFS)
    ===========================================================================================================
    1. Jump: EB 52 90
    2. OEM Name: NTFS
    3. Bytes per Sector: 512
    4. Sectors per Cluster: 128
    5. Reserved Sectors: 0
    6. Number of FATs: 0
    7. Root Dir Entries: 0
    8. Total Sectors: 0
    9. Media Descriptor: 0xF8
    10. Sectors per FAT: 0
    11. Sectors per Track: 63 (0x3F)
    12. Number of Heads: 255 (0xFF)
    13. Hidden Sectors: 63 (0x3F)
    14. Total Sectors (>32MB): 0 (0x0)
    15. Unused: 0x80008000
    16. Total NTFS Sectors: 21735881
    17. MFT Start Cluster: 49152
    18. MFT Mirror Start Clust: 84905
    19. Clusters per FRS: 246
    20. Clusters per Index Blk: 244
    21. Serial Number: 0x323AF0E23AF0A44F
    22. Checksum: 0 (0x0)
    23. Boot Signature: 0xAA55

    ===========================================================================================================
    Boot Record for drive E: (Drive: 1, Starting sector: 38,122,308, Type: NTFS)
    ===========================================================================================================
    1. Jump: EB 52 90
    2. OEM Name: NTFS
    3. Bytes per Sector: 512
    4. Sectors per Cluster: 128
    5. Reserved Sectors: 0
    6. Number of FATs: 0
    7. Root Dir Entries: 0
    8. Total Sectors: 0
    9. Media Descriptor: 0xF8
    10. Sectors per FAT: 0
    11. Sectors per Track: 63 (0x3F)
    12. Number of Heads: 255 (0xFF)
    13. Hidden Sectors: 63 (0x3F)
    14. Total Sectors (>32MB): 0 (0x0)
    15. Unused: 0x80008000
    16. Total NTFS Sectors: 36869111
    17. MFT Start Cluster: 49152

    18. MFT Mirror Start Clust: 144019
    19. Clusters per FRS: 246
    20. Clusters per Index Blk: 244
    21. Serial Number: 0x68EC2232EC21FB48
    22. Checksum: 0 (0x0)
    23. Boot Signature: 0xAA55

    ===========================================================================================================
    Boot Record for drive F: (Drive: 1, Starting sector: 74,991,483, Type: NTFS)
    ===========================================================================================================
    1. Jump: EB 52 90
    2. OEM Name: NTFS
    3. Bytes per Sector: 512
    4. Sectors per Cluster: 2
    5. Reserved Sectors: 0
    6. Number of FATs: 0
    7. Root Dir Entries: 0
    8. Total Sectors: 0
    9. Media Descriptor: 0xF8
    10. Sectors per FAT: 0
    11. Sectors per Track: 63 (0x3F)
    12. Number of Heads: 255 (0xFF)
    13. Hidden Sectors: 63 (0x3F)
    14. Total Sectors (>32MB): 0 (0x0)
    15. Unused: 0x80008000
    16. Total NTFS Sectors: 4096511
    17. MFT Start Cluster: 682752
    18. MFT Mirror Start Clust: 1024127
    19. Clusters per FRS: 1
    20. Clusters per Index Blk: 4
    21. Serial Number: 0x68789F75789F412C
    22. Checksum: 0 (0x0)
    23. Boot Signature: 0xAA55

    ===========================================================================================================
    Boot Record for drive G: (Drive: 1, Starting sector: 79,088,058, Type: NTFS)
    ===========================================================================================================
    1. Jump: EB 52 90
    2. OEM Name: NTFS
    3. Bytes per Sector: 512
    4. Sectors per Cluster: 1
    5. Reserved Sectors: 0
    6. Number of FATs: 0
    7. Root Dir Entries: 0
    8. Total Sectors: 0
    9. Media Descriptor: 0xF8
    10. Sectors per FAT: 0
    11. Sectors per Track: 63 (0x3F)
    12. Number of Heads: 255 (0xFF)
    13. Hidden Sectors: 63 (0x3F)
    14. Total Sectors (>32MB): 0 (0x0)
    15. Unused: 0x80008000
    16. Total NTFS Sectors: 36869111
    17. MFT Start Cluster: 6291456
    18. MFT Mirror Start Clust: 18434555
    19. Clusters per FRS: 2
    20. Clusters per Index Blk: 8
    21. Serial Number: 0xA6A84028A83FF601
    22. Checksum: 0 (0x0)
    23. Boot Signature: 0xAA55

    ===========================================================================================================
    Boot Record for drive H: (Drive: 1, Starting sector: 115,957,233, Type: NTFS)
    ===========================================================================================================
    1. Jump: EB 52 90
    2. OEM Name: NTFS
    3. Bytes per Sector: 512
    4. Sectors per Cluster: 128
    5. Reserved Sectors: 0
    6. Number of FATs: 0
    7. Root Dir Entries: 0
    8. Total Sectors: 0
    9. Media Descriptor: 0xF8
    10. Sectors per FAT: 0
    11. Sectors per Track: 63 (0x3F)
    12. Number of Heads: 255 (0xFF)
    13. Hidden Sectors: 63 (0x3F)
    14. Total Sectors (>32MB): 0 (0x0)
    15. Unused: 0x80008000
    16. Total NTFS Sectors: 4096511
    17. MFT Start Cluster: 10668
    18. MFT Mirror Start Clust: 16001
    19. Clusters per FRS: 246
    20. Clusters per Index Blk: 244
    21. Serial Number: 0xE25678F65678CCB3
    22. Checksum: 0 (0x0)
    23. Boot Signature: 0xAA55
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

  5. #5
    Nix's Avatar
    Nix is offline Aka: Nix*, NNiixx, Nix23
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,255
    Well that has to be the biggest longest post I've ever seen !!!

  6. #6
    DrMDJ is offline Virtual PC Specialist!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    NJ, USA
    Posts
    8,428
    ExtendedX type partitions came in to being with Win98 (or maybe win95B, I forget) and were meant as an extension/evolution based on the newer, larger hard drives coming out. Given the fact that your hard drive is as large as it is it is appropriate that the extended partition should be an ExtendedX type.

    You should be able to use a 64k (non-standard) cluster size if you want, so I'm not sure why your being prevented from changing that. Is it PM that won't let ya do it? You do have enough free space to accomidate going to the larger cluster size don't ya (cause increasing the cluster size is gonna increase the space consumed by some amount)?
    Please remember to post back whether your problem is resolved or
    not, so that others may gain from the knowledge.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    N. VANCOUVER CANADA
    Posts
    1,645
    When you let Windows format during installtion doesn't that give you the optimal cluster size, that you cant get using PM?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288
    yes it is PM that isnt letting me. it only lets me go to 32K. it says 64K is Not Enabled. I am pretty sure i have enough free space. i slipstreamed xp so my C: drive is only about 800 megs on a 7.81 GB partion. pretty sure i have enough space.....lol

    does all my info look ok? i didnt knotice any problems in it but then again i dont know exactly what to look for. thanx for all ur help.



    //edit - yes Nix it is quite long....thank God for copy/paste

    //edit 2 - ok i just tried runnning PM in normal mode and it gave me the option of 64K, but i cliked on apply and all that happened was the PM window disappeared them reappered real quick and that operation was gone.
    Last edited by MaFia JaK; November 14th, 2004 at 10:31 PM.
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288
    u posted while i was posting robertw. No, windows xp just lets u choose between NTFS, FAT, NTFS (Quick), and FAT (Quick)

    i assume u r talking about windows xp. it has been so long since i have used 98 i cant remember about that and i have no idea about ME, 2000, or NT
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

  10. #10
    Nix's Avatar
    Nix is offline Aka: Nix*, NNiixx, Nix23
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,255
    I thought that 4K was the optimal size and that NTFS uses that by default ?

    or are you saying that you want bigger than that ?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288
    yes 4K is the default size but to my understanding and i could very easily be wrong, the larger the cluster, the better the performance. i was able to change it to 32K but it says 64K is not enabled. but yet i was able to change the other partitions that i wanted to change to 64K. but not the one with windows one it.
    Last edited by MaFia JaK; November 14th, 2004 at 11:53 PM.
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

  12. #12
    Nix's Avatar
    Nix is offline Aka: Nix*, NNiixx, Nix23
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,255
    You do realise that using 64K clusters will result in lots of slackspace in small files ?

    eg a file that contains 100 characters for example will be 100bytes but it's size on disk will be 64Kb so you would have wasted 65436 bytes

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    288
    yes i realize that. i have plenty of space, thats why i have no problem sacrificing space for performance

    C Drive - Windows XP - 8,001.1 MB - 32K Cluster Size
    D Drive - Programs - 10,613.2 MB - 64K Cluster Size
    E Drive - Games and Music - 18,002.5 MB - 64K Cluster Size
    F Drive - Documents - 2,000.2 MB - 1K Cluster Size
    G Drive - Backups and Miscellaneous - 18,002.5 MB - 512b Cluster Size
    H Drive - Page File - 2,000.2 MB - 64K Cluster Size

    thats my current info for the partitions still trying to change C Drive to 64K though

    //edit - says i will be wasting 175.3 MB if i change to 64K
    Last edited by MaFia JaK; November 15th, 2004 at 12:09 AM.
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." -Albert Einstein

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •