Security vulnerability in Jpegs - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 44

Thread: Security vulnerability in Jpegs

  1. #16
    Nix's Avatar
    Nix is offline Aka: Nix*, NNiixx, Nix23
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,255
    Btw is it just me or does this only work in IE a not Firefox.

    The button is greyed out in FF.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    6,447
    It uses ActiveX to run code locally on your machine, so it requires IE.
    Safe computing is a habit, not a toolkit.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Friern Barnet, London, England
    Posts
    46,565
    And the first exploits are well under way, according to this:

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18585

    WinXP users should seriously consider upgrading to SP2 IMO, enad everytone else should get patched. I think this is going to be a big one when it hits
    Nick.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    10,060
    For those paranoid folk there a GDI Scan tool thats been produced for scanning all your applications to check if any are vulnerable

    gdiscan.exe was written for Windows 2000 and higher. It scans the drive containing the Windows %system% directory and Looks for vulnerable versions of gdiplus.dll, sxs.dll, wsxs.dll, mso.dll.

    The scan starts upon execution. It will signal completion of scan in text box with "Done."

    Vulnerable versions of the .dll files are listed in RED.

    The path where a vulnerable .dll file is found is important. Remember that dlls are loaded in the following order (note: this is a VAST simplification):


    The directory from which the application loaded.
    The (application's) current directory.
    Windows 95/98: The Windows system directory (default: C:\Windows\system)
    Windows NT+: The 32-bit Windows system directory (default: C:\WinNT\System32)
    Windows NT+: The 16-bit Windows system directory (default: C:\WinNT\System)
    The Windows directory (default: C:\WinNT or C:\Windows)
    The directories that are listed in the PATH environment variable

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    sc,united states
    Posts
    3,631
    If I Ain't Crappie Fishin', I'm Thinkin' About It

    listen with your eyes---its the only way to believe what you hear...

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    Hayward, CA, USA, EARTH
    Posts
    1,852
    My suspicion is that MS added the code to allow backdoors into JPEG's to satisfy the DOJ's assault on pedophiles. That is purely a guess.
    AsusA7N8X, AthlonXP2200
    gForce4600+ti & Audigy Platnium, FPS SOUND. AKA- The ultimate gaming machine (well it WAS three years ago anyway).

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM USA
    Posts
    14,686
    Concerning
    http://www.microsoft.com/security/bulletins/200409_jpeg_tool.mspx
    maybe this has been said already, but I am finally realizing that the above page is a diagnostic tool to tell you if you need the GDI+ security update. If Step 3 indicates no further action is needed, then so be it. If step 3 says you need the GDI+ security update, you will get instructions where to get it.
    Since Windows Update offered this website to me, I assumed it was the GDI+ security fix, itself, which it isn't.
    Jim
    WIN7 Ultimate SP1 64bit, IE 11, NTFS,
    cable, MS Security Essentials, Windows 7 firewall

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    26.03°N 80.14°W
    Posts
    9,410
    Vernon Frazee, Microsoft MVP (Windows - Shell/User)

    Defenses Up!
    Tip: When prompted for a password, give an incorrect one first. A phishing site will accept it; a legitimate one won't.


    Inside Spyware: A Guide to Finding, Removing and Preventing Online Pests


    If you don't keep up with security fixes, your computer|network won't be yours for long.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM USA
    Posts
    14,686
    Vernon Frazee--So what are those who are not offered the GDI+ security update (since they do not run Office components) to do about the vulnerability in IE?
    Jim
    WIN7 Ultimate SP1 64bit, IE 11, NTFS,
    cable, MS Security Essentials, Windows 7 firewall

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    10,060
    Or MS Works which also does not have a patch either
    Last edited by 104456; September 29th, 2004 at 02:18 PM.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN USA
    Posts
    3,733
    According to the Internet Storm Center at the SANS Institute, computers with updated versions of anti-virus software should be protected also.

    Hackers Target Microsoft's JPEG Flaw
    http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansas...9784184.htm?1c

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    6,447
    Originally posted by DuaneB
    According to the Internet Storm Center at the SANS Institute, computers with updated versions of anti-virus software should be protected also.
    From this one, until someone else creates another exploit for the same vuln and gets it out widely before the AV vendors catch up.

    Antivirus software is a nice safety net, but it really can't be relied on as an alternative to patching.
    Safe computing is a habit, not a toolkit.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    26.03°N 80.14°W
    Posts
    9,410
    GDI+ JPEG Vulnerability: Info/FAQ/Fix
    http://discussions.virtualdr.com/sho...hreadid=173993
    Vernon Frazee, Microsoft MVP (Windows - Shell/User)

    Defenses Up!
    Tip: When prompted for a password, give an incorrect one first. A phishing site will accept it; a legitimate one won't.


    Inside Spyware: A Guide to Finding, Removing and Preventing Online Pests


    If you don't keep up with security fixes, your computer|network won't be yours for long.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM USA
    Posts
    14,686
    Vernon Frazee--Thanks for the very informative references.
    I have run the gdiscan and found five "vulnerable" versions of gdiplus.dll, two of which were in Microsoft files
    C:\I386\ASMS\1000\MSFT\WINDOWS\GDIPLUS\GDIPLUS.DLL
    Version: 5.1.3097.0 <-- Vulnerable version
    C:\I386\gdiplus.dll
    Version: 5.1.3097.0 <-- Vulnerable version
    The new version from the SDK download is
    5.1.3102.1360
    Has anybody here actually replaced the "vulnerable" version with the new version? Systems still work? Always nice to learn from someone else's experience.
    Jim
    WIN7 Ultimate SP1 64bit, IE 11, NTFS,
    cable, MS Security Essentials, Windows 7 firewall

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    10,060
    Just had the GDI scan note vulnerabilities in Works 7 and NSW2004 as below and replaced both with the patched version and all seems to be working.


    C:\Program Files\Microsoft Works\gdiplus.dll
    Version: 5.1.3079.3 <-- Vulnerable version [Works v 7]
    C:\Program Files\Norton SystemWorks\Password Manager\gdiplus.dll
    Version: 5.1.3097.0 <-- Vulnerable version [ NSW 2004]
    C:\Program Files\Symantec\Web Tools\GDIPlus.dll
    Version: 5.1.3097.0 <-- Vulnerable version [NSW 2004]

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •