Originally posted by jerryctx
How about censorship to save lives? That's the big issue in the US after 9/11 (although most of the "homeland defense" laws are a waste of effort, but that's a different issue).
I can see how that's an issue when using your definition of censorship, but I don't see how it's a problem when using mine. That sort of national security info tends to be owned by government agencies (who are choosing to keep it secret), or contractors to those agencies (who voluntarily agree to the secrecy as a condition of doing the work).