|
-
November 14th, 2003, 07:21 PM
#1
V. 90 ISA 56k modem vs. V.92 PCI 56k modem.
What would be the advantage of having the V.92 PCI 56k over the ISA V.90 56k? This is taking into account both of them are hardware based and are not Winmodems.
I'm sorry about posting so much lately. Its just that I have questions.
-
November 14th, 2003, 08:55 PM
#2
A31Chris--Sorry I cannot comment on the difference between a PCI and an ISA modem, but one of the first things to determine is whether your ISP will support v.92. If not you cannot get the benefits of v.92.
Jim
WIN7 Ultimate SP1 64bit, IE 11, NTFS,
cable, MS Security Essentials, Windows 7 firewall
-
November 19th, 2003, 10:07 AM
#3
Hello,
First off Isa hardware based modems can be run without any cpu resousrces whatsoever. The US Robotics Courier Isa modem is just such a modem. It can run on a 386 all day long without problems. The pages may take a while to display due to all the graphics and limitted ram 386 computers have to run the browsers....etc but that is a different subject!
With PCI Modems they all will use a slight amount of CPU resources if they are hardware based and even more if they are soft modems. Now there are two different types of soft modems out there ones with dsp (digital signal processor) and ones without. US Robotics PCI anything modems Seem harder to configure and almost never just plug and play. Seems I am always having to juggle resources to make them happy or switching PCI slots... I don't like em. The Win modem was especially bad, horrible, the worst ever!
For soft modems I like Lucent based ones and for hardware based 0 resource using modems I only like Serial Port Courier Modems. You can get those $300.00 v.90 ones off of ebay for $40.00 or less. Used V.92 ones for $50.00 or so. A used Courier is better than any New Modem I have ever used! Bar None!!
As for V.92 Modems it is as far as i know backwards compatible to the V.90 standard. Here is a link to V.92 and why you should be running it! Link
If your getting A new modem at least get a V.92 and most serial port ones are resource users! Usb just like PCI will use CPU resources!
If it ain't broke, you arn't trying hard enough!!
-
November 19th, 2003, 10:33 AM
#4
Someone should mention that the PCI modems may have
some 'minimum requirements' to run their modem. Several
will work on a pentium1 . However, before purchasing any
new hardware, make certain that the computer you want to
install it in meets/exceeds the 'minimum requirements'.
If it says right on the box that it needs a pentiumII processor
at 266mhz and 32MB of RAM, you should not install that
into anything less. Personally I would not install such a modem
into a 266, because , even though it says it will work, it would
probably not perform so well. It would be okay in a pentium3,
as far as I am concerned.
Last edited by cleaverb; November 19th, 2003 at 10:36 AM.
i love to tinker, my ideas may be unorthodox.i don't suggest it if i
haven't tried it. it might not remember
how well it worked, only that it did.
My PC:
Intel 865GLC motherboard,
Intel P4 2.40CGhz Northwood socket 478,
1,512MB Samsung 3200 DDR,WD 80GB 800JB,
Toshiba 16X DVD-ROM,Lite-On DVD-RW,
Saphire Radeon 9250 256MB DDR video,
3C905TX NIC,Audigy LS,450watt PS.
Dual boot WinME and XP SP2 .
-
November 19th, 2003, 03:58 PM
#5
Thanks for the input. I recently bought an Intel V.92 PCI hardware based modem brand new off ebay for pretty cheap. It says its a PCI/Data/Fax/Speakerphone modem. It has no minimum CPU requirements listed anywhere that I can find. It does however, say it will run on Windows 95.
I bought it at a spur of the moment when I thought my US Robotics modem had conked out.
Chris
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|