|
-
December 17th, 2008, 09:33 AM
#16
 Originally Posted by crunchie
Only been patched if it is actually installed  .
How does popularity equate to security?
if i use a browser that only five people use, the risk of a security breach is rare even if there is a known hole. What are the chances that a website that has code in it to take advantage of my insecure browser is one that I will visit. Who would even want to take advantage of an exploit on a browser that five people use. Now if i use a browser that 5 million people use the risks are extremely higher since you have a better chance of gaining access via a hole. A pretty good percentage of those 5 million will most likely go to ebay or amazon.com
-
December 17th, 2008, 09:35 AM
#17
 Originally Posted by jdlenke
if i use a browser that only five people use, the risk of a security breach is rare even if there is a known hole. What are the chances that a website that has code in it to take advantage of my insecure browser is one that I will visit. Who would even want to take advantage of an exploit on a browser that five people use. Now if i use a browser that 5 million people use the risks are extremely higher since you have a better chance of gaining access via a hole. A pretty good percentage of those 5 million will most likely go to ebay or amazon.com
Which by the way, is the same reason Linux and Apple are less virus prone.
-
December 17th, 2008, 02:35 PM
#18
Firefox 3 Release Notes
v3.0.5, released December 16, 2008
http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/f.../releasenotes/
MFSA 2008-69 XSS vulnerabilities in SessionStore
MFSA 2008-68 XSS and JavaScript privilege escalation
MFSA 2008-67 Escaped null characters ignored by CSS parser
MFSA 2008-66 Errors parsing URLs with leading whitespace and control characters
MFSA 2008-65 Cross-domain data theft via script redirect error message
MFSA 2008-64 XMLHttpRequest 302 response disclosure
MFSA 2008-63 User tracking via XUL persist attribute
MFSA 2008-60 Crashes with evidence of memory corruption (rv:1.9.0.5/1.8.1.19)
Looks like they had to fix the same thing.
-
December 17th, 2008, 03:48 PM
#19
 Originally Posted by SpywareDr
 Didn't mean to step on any toes.
Not mine. I wear steel capped boots .
-
December 17th, 2008, 03:51 PM
#20
 Originally Posted by jdlenke
if i use a browser that only five people use, the risk of a security breach is rare even if there is a known hole. What are the chances that a website that has code in it to take advantage of my insecure browser is one that I will visit. Who would even want to take advantage of an exploit on a browser that five people use. Now if i use a browser that 5 million people use the risks are extremely higher since you have a better chance of gaining access via a hole. A pretty good percentage of those 5 million will most likely go to ebay or amazon.com
That does not answer the question though. How does popularity make an application more or less, secure?
I understand what you are saying and agree that the more popular, the more it is targetted, but that in itself does not make an app less safe.
-
December 17th, 2008, 04:32 PM
#21
Other than the popularity bit, no reason why it would or would not be safer.
With over 100 different browsers available, my guess, use what you want to use.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers
-
December 18th, 2008, 03:11 AM
#22
 Originally Posted by crunchie
That does not answer the question though. How does popularity make an application more or less, secure?
I understand what you are saying and agree that the more popular, the more it is targetted, but that in itself does not make an app less safe.
Popularity does not make something more or less secure. It's popularity simply exposes it's vulnerabilities.
-
December 18th, 2008, 05:56 AM
#23
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|