|
-
May 15th, 2001, 06:34 AM
#1
Format C: /U does it still work
Hi All
I have noticed there is a lot of discussion lately about if the "U" switch still works with the Format command.
I have been using for years and now I am wondering if it actually works, I would have thought if it was not working I would get some sort of illegal switch response, but thats not the case. So could anyone tell me for sure if the "U" switch still works.
The only switch I know that has been removed is the "S" switch in ME, thats OK I never used it anyway but I would like to use the "U" switch.
Appreciate any thoughts
Qualifications:
I have read:
Windows 3.11 for Dummies
Windows 95 for Dummies (Second Chapter)
Fed up with UK 0870 Phone Numbers
Backup Boogaloo, you know it makes sense to do.
-
May 15th, 2001, 07:10 AM
#2
hi, I believe it still does. Havent used it in awhile.... u= unconditional
------------------
"Onward Through the fog"
ErrorCity
"ONWARD THROUGH THE FOG"
"640K ought to be enough for anybody." - - Bill Gates, 1981
AMAZING TECHS
-
May 15th, 2001, 07:45 AM
#3
My understanding is that the /U (unconditional) paramter became redundant starting with DOS 7.x and was disabled with ME. Prior to this DOS provided the UNFORMAT command, which was coupled to whether a FORMAT /U had been done or not. When the UNFORMAT command was dropped there was no need for the /U option and all formats became "unconditional". The /U continued to be accepted, but was effectively ignored.
------------------
Bookmark your post to make it easier to find.
And remember, please post back whether the problem is resolved or not.
Please remember to post back whether your problem is resolved or
not, so that others may gain from the knowledge.
-
May 15th, 2001, 10:59 AM
#4
Thanks folks,
Looks like you saved my typing finger, I wont bother with the /U in future.
Qualifications:
I have read:
Windows 3.11 for Dummies
Windows 95 for Dummies (Second Chapter)
Fed up with UK 0870 Phone Numbers
Backup Boogaloo, you know it makes sense to do.
-
May 15th, 2001, 10:06 PM
#5
hi all
this is academic, and maybe inconclusive.
but, the limited test I ran yesterday proved to me that the /u is still functional in win98SE, and format "tout court" does not format unconditionally.
well, I saw "a" thread, and I tried a few things.
I still have the old DOStools mirror and unformat sitting on drive
I call these incomplete tests since I had no fat16 drive hooked up so I ran these tests on a floppy.
(anyhow, mirror won't work on fat32, but will on fat16, and unformat needs the mirrordata. edit >> SEE LATER POST.)
the test;
mirror A: on a floppy with files
format a: (winse version)
unformat a:
presto, data recovered
dir A: to prove it
winse format a: /U
old dos unformat A:
data is lost to unformat
old style format on fat16 said something like "saving unformat data"
I wasn't gonna format a fat32 data drive to look if it still does.
(even if norton could recover it. and No, I don't use norton mirror.)
I do have a couple small drives in FAT16 I could test this on.
however, it is academic, ain't it?
only thing is, the /U switch still does what it did, and IMHO, without ain't unconditional.
Jaak
[This message has been edited by jtdoom (edited 05-16-2001).]
Kind regards, Jaak.
When I pull my bootstraps, why don't I load Windows?
-
May 15th, 2001, 10:49 PM
#6
This is Win98OEM format switch combo:
C:\>format /?
Formats a disk for use with MS-DOS.
FORMAT drive: [/V[:label]] [/Q] [/F:size] [/B | /S] [/C]
FORMAT drive: [/V[:label]] [/Q] [/T:tracks /N:sectors] [/B | /S] [/C]
FORMAT drive: [/V[:label]] [/Q] [/1] [/4] [/B | /S] [/C]
FORMAT drive: [/Q] [/1] [/4] [/8] [/B | /S] [/C]
/V[:label] Specifies the volume label.
/Q Performs a quick format.
/F:size Specifies the size of the floppy disk to format (such as 160, 180, 320, 360, 720, 1.2, 1.44, 2.88).
/B Allocates space on the formatted disk for system files.
/S Copies system files to the formatted disk.
/T:tracks Specifies the number of tracks per disk side.
/N:sectors Specifies the number of sectors per track.
/1 Formats a single side of a floppy disk.
/4 Formats a 5.25-inch 360K floppy disk in a high-density drive.
/8 Formats eight sectors per track.
/C Tests clusters that are currently marked "bad."
------------------
"Darnit Jim, I'm a doctor, not a Windows Beta Tester."
-
May 16th, 2001, 02:22 AM
#7
Looks like I'm confused again.
Qualifications:
I have read:
Windows 3.11 for Dummies
Windows 95 for Dummies (Second Chapter)
Fed up with UK 0870 Phone Numbers
Backup Boogaloo, you know it makes sense to do.
-
May 16th, 2001, 02:31 AM
#8
No reason to be confused.
/U still works in 98se, from Jaak's testing.
The M$ documentation is BS. Oh no, say it isn't so.
-
May 16th, 2001, 07:45 AM
#9
Hi all,
just hooked up an old clunker
(a caviar 280 with 80.1MB formatted space. )
at first glance, the old DOS6.22 mirror tool won't work on any sort of hard drive in 98 environment.
the reason, Long file name protection.
the different modes have differing error message.
when run in real mode, one must reboot
message said something about LOCK.....
when run in dosbox, windows itself comes up with a message about an old dos tool, and says something about long file name protection...
it allows you Y/N in the message, and mirroring is not succesful.
still works on floppy in both modes, tho.
Go figure 
however, it said something about LOCK
what I did next was simple
LOCK D:
mirror D:
and presto, mirror worked
and the rest works too.
mirror and unformat won't work without direct access (iow, lock)
conclusions;
- DOS6.22 unformat works on a floppy when mirror was run on it
- unformat still recovers data when win98SE's format was used to format A:
- unformat cannot recover data when format A: /U was ran
- mirror and unformat cannot be used on hard drive without first locking it.
- mirror and unformat are no longer intended to be used as they apparently have an issue with long file names. Even in win98, REAL MODE DOS still uses the 8.3 convention.
- don't rely on LFNBK.EXE util (on win98 CDROM) to get you out of a mess. It ain't intuitive...
- Microsoft killed their best tools
Thank god for third party utilities 
final final conclusion.
/U ain't so academic yet?
btw, after tests like this, one must not forget to UNLOCK D:
Jaak
[This message has been edited by jtdoom (edited 05-16-2001).]
Kind regards, Jaak.
When I pull my bootstraps, why don't I load Windows?
-
May 16th, 2001, 04:55 PM
#10
Thanks for the info, I'll just stay confused.
Qualifications:
I have read:
Windows 3.11 for Dummies
Windows 95 for Dummies (Second Chapter)
Fed up with UK 0870 Phone Numbers
Backup Boogaloo, you know it makes sense to do.
-
May 16th, 2001, 05:03 PM
#11
philgo,
I've yet to encounter the first tellurian [that/who] will understand my convoluted rants.
LOL
jaak, Deneb IV
Kind regards, Jaak.
When I pull my bootstraps, why don't I load Windows?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|