|
-
June 26th, 2007, 12:28 PM
#1
If you were going to spend $30 milllion on a computer...
You'd expect to get more than four 400GB hard drives, surely 
Even my main rig has nearly as much storage. It does have 62,974 less CPU cores though 
http://www.wired.com/science/discove..._supercomputer
Nick.
-
June 26th, 2007, 12:49 PM
#2
Is that it?
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40589
The firm claims to have built a one-petaflop system with 294,912-processors in a 72-rack system, harnessed to a high-speed, optical network. It says the Blue Gene/P system design can be scaled up to an 884,736-processor, 216-rack cluster to deliver three petaflops.
One petaflop is one-quadrillion operations per second. IBM says the system is 100,000 times more powerful than a home PC and can process more operations in one second than the combined power of a stack of laptop computers nearly 1.5 miles high.
Not bad i suppose....
Liam
Desktop:I5 2500K|Asus P8Z68-V|8GB Corsair Vengeance|1280MB Nvidia 560 TI PE|1TB Seagate/60GB OCZ SSD|LG Blu-ray Writer|Corsair 750W
27" iMac:I5 2500S|12GB Crucial DDR3|ATI 1GB 6970|1TB|Superdrive|Mighty Mouse 
-
June 26th, 2007, 12:51 PM
#3
Bet it doesn't have a DVD-RW or a decent graphics card
TEk
-
June 26th, 2007, 03:12 PM
#4
They're all probably Pentium IIs.
-
June 26th, 2007, 04:14 PM
#5
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/deepco.../bluegene.html
Think they are a tad newer than P IIs
A bit power hungry though.
Power - 40 kW power consumption per rack
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/deepco...pspecsheet.pdf
-
June 26th, 2007, 05:24 PM
#6
It sounds like something too good to be true. Is this being sold by the infamous Michael's Computers? More procs than gigabytes! Hmmmm.
-
June 27th, 2007, 05:48 AM
#7
 Originally Posted by lgbpop
They're all probably Pentium IIs.
http://www.wired.com/science/discove..._supercomputer
Under the hood, Ranger's brain will be built from 16,744 quad-core AMD Opteron processors. The machine's production timeline is dependent on how fast AMD can crank out the as-yet-unreleased chips, Bechtolsheim said.
-
June 27th, 2007, 11:16 AM
#8
give it 20 years and we will all have pc's like that! lol
Windows 7, Asus P5Q-E iP45 , Core 2 Duo E8400, 4GB Ballistix DDR2 800MHz, GeForce 9600.
-
June 27th, 2007, 11:36 AM
#9
 Originally Posted by liam858
Don't forget we have a budget of only $30 million.
I pity the technician who has to service this baby. "Now lets see, which processor is it thats causing the BSOD".
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|