Quote Originally Posted by rythymace View Post
I'd appreciate it much more if the person doing the describing sounded more credible.
A least credible person tells you what to think. Never posts facts or defines important numbers. Meanwhile, others think the least credible are those who never provide anything without the always required reasons why.

Some see credibility in their feelings. Others see it only with numbers. For example, if you tell me something and provide no facts and numbers, then I must conclude you are lying. Others - a majority - find no credibility in facts and numbers.

Your choice. How many here designed power supplies? Well, one who did and you then concluded he was least credible? Why? Notice how many facts were provided that are not common knowledge, based in technical knowledge, AND that can be confirmed from other sources.

For example, did that supply come with a long list of numeric specs? If not, that is a first indication it is missing essential functions including those listed in the first post. Few know what any of those numbers say. But when specifications are not provided, then the 1% or 5% who actually know this stuff cannot provide any advise. Only speculation becomes a recommendation.

The least credible source makes claims without numerous reasons why - and numbers. A majority often do not understand that simple technology concept. A majority have virtually no idea how complex a standard supply must be. The specification sheet should be a full page.