SCSI ultra 320 vs. ATA-100
Hi!
I have another question. I may be getting some Seagate Cheetah ultra 320 SCSI drives, and a controller card soon. I know how to set up basic SCSI chains, but my question is: If I set up these drives in RAID 1, and use them to boot off of, would there be a noticable speed differance over ATA-100, which I am using now? If so, I want to use these drives for Windows and applications, and demote my ATA-100 drives to storage. Thanks in advance!
(PS, I know SATA's probably better, but I'm broke. My brother's giving me the SCSI drives for free, since he dosen't need them anymore.)
My Network:
-Workstation1: AMD64 3400+; 1gb RAM; 360GB Hdd space; GeForce FX5500; SB Live! 24-bit audio;WinXP Pro SP2
-Workstation2: PentiumIII 800 Coppermine; 384MB RAM; 36 & 9gb Ultra 160 HDD's; Matrox G400 Dual Head; Yamaha DS1 audio; Win2k Pro SP4
-Workstation3: PentiumIII 800 Coppermine; 384MB RAM; 80GB HDD; GeForce MX4000; SB Live! Basic audio; Win2k Pro SP4
-Laptop: Pentium M 1.66GHz; 512MB RAM; 27GB HDD;
Win XP Pro SP2