SpywareBlaster 3.1
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: SpywareBlaster 3.1

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    70

    SpywareBlaster 3.1

    Is there a YEA or NAY consensus around here re this piece of freeware?

    On this machine running W's 98SE, I will need to do the vbrun60sp5.exe 'upgrade' & donwanna/fear-to-bother w/it if not worth the program benefits vs possible hooha w/an otherwise currently stable OS install. TIA.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN USA
    Posts
    3,733
    I use it, like it and haven't had any problems with it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Spokane, Washington
    Posts
    842
    Great tool.... I also use Adaware 6.
    Never had any problems with either.
    Trying to help others accomplish success, by sharing what I have learned from others.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Belfast, Ulster.
    Posts
    1,862
    Using Win98 FE

    I have always regarded it as one of the default programs that you should always be using .

    Firewall (freeware is fine), antivirus (freeware or paid ,anything but Norton ), spywareblaster, spybot and ad-aware. The basic programs I always encourage my friends to use.

    Combined with a good HOSTS file and IE-Spyad , occasional scans at an online antivirus scanner , an anti trojan tool or two , CWShredder and Hijackthis , about the minimum needed to brave the internet these days !
    Current PC

    Zoostorm
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit, (XP Mode virtual pc enabled)
    WEI 7.4, 7.6, 7.9, 7.9, 5.9
    Intel Core i5-2310, 8GB Ram
    Geforce GTX 660 OC
    Samsung Syncmaster SA300 23.6" monitor

    Folding@home
    User Name Sintares
    Team guru3d

    There is no such thing as overkill. 'Open fire' and 'is it dead?' are the only sane options when threatened.

  5. #5
    HAN's Avatar
    HAN is offline Virtual PC Specialist!!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,319
    IMO, if one is going to use MS's Internet Explorer, SpywareBlaster is very important. It helps to protect against known bad ActiveX downloads. And the best thing of all is that it does it without running as an active process (so it doesn't use up any critical RAM resources. (SWB also adds a banned site list that runs with no resource usage too.)

    And even if you use a browser that doesn't use ActiveX (such as Firefox or Mozilla), SWB's banned site protection still helps to keep you from troubles.

    I've used SWB on several machines and had zero issues. It works great. Just a well designed and executed product.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    70
    Done, done & done. Looks good & is very user friendly. So many products available, it's hard to stay well-informed re the latest & greatest. Thx for all the feedback.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Here, there and everywhere
    Posts
    7,355
    Just to add my opinion, after a reinstall of windows Spyware blaster is one of the first programs i install along with the above mentioned, and IMO is a must for any system.
    Who are you? Introduce yourself here

    P3-450 powered by

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
    Gigabyte 965P DQ6
    4 Gig Crucial Ballistix PC6400
    Gainward Nvidia Geforce 7950GT
    2X Western Digital Caviar 320GB SATA2
    Soundblaster X-Fi XtremeMusic
    Samsung SH-D162C DVD Rom
    Lite-On SHM-165P6S DVDRW
    Samsung 20" LCD Syncmaster 206BW
    Thermaltake Kandalf VA9000SWA Tower
    Tagan Dual Engine 700W PSU
    XP PRO SP3/Windows 7 64-bit
    --------------
    Samsung NC10 2GB Ram
    Windows 7 32-bit

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    The Big Apple, New York City
    Posts
    140
    I kept reading about it from other members and downloaded it myself a couple of months ago. A great program. No problems.
    "There is a solution for every problem; if not today, then tomorrow"

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    287

    spwayre blaster and 98SE

    Ok, I have been reading a lot of positive things about Spywareblaster too and am running 98SE .

    Just curious - what is a vbrun60sp5.exe 'upgrade' ?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    6,447
    Programs written in Visual Basic require something called the VB Runtime to be installed on a machine before they'll work -- it's a set of common underlying functions which all VB apps rely on, so shipping it separately keeps the size of individual VB apps down. VBRUN60SP5.EXE is the runtime for stuff written in Visual Basic 6 with service pack 5.
    Safe computing is a habit, not a toolkit.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    287

    thanks

    Thanks for the info -
    another dumb question - I recently upgraded to IE 6 and have all the service packs installed - will the vb run time already have been installed via that means ? Thanks again .

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM USA
    Posts
    14,686
    chercat--Run a Find for VBRUN60SP5.EXE . If it is on your hard drive, you got it. If not you can get it here.
    http://www.karenware.com/powertools/runtimes.asp
    Jim
    WIN7 Ultimate SP1 64bit, IE 11, NTFS,
    cable, MS Security Essentials, Windows 7 firewall

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    70

    Re: spwayre blaster and 98SE

    Originally posted by Chercat
    Ok, I have been reading a lot of positive things about Spywareblaster too and am running 98SE .

    Just curious - what is a vbrun60sp5.exe 'upgrade' ?
    What I learned at the MS KB in exploring that issue:

    http://support.microsoft.com/default...93&Product=w98

    Msvbvm50.dll is the Visual Basic Virtual Machine and is the required run- time library for Visual Basic 5.0 applications. The version of Msvbvm50.dll that is included in Windows 98 is 05.00.4319, which is the same version included in Visual Basic 5.0 Service Pack 2 and Visual Studio 97 Service Pack 3.

    Don't know why it wasn't on my machine, but it wasn't. The SpywareBlaster d/l page provides a link to the required file & is what I used to acquire it - a self-extracting executable that installs I know not where. (Checking, I see the MSVBVM60.DLL is in c:\windows\system, but I sure didn't know to put it there.) My install error message was that I was missing MSVBVM60.DLL. Installing the vbrun60sp5.exe 'upgrade' brought w/it the above .dll file/library I was missing. Further, when I went looking for just MSVBVM60.DLL, it was easily found, but when executed, I was asked where I wanted to install it. Me clueless, so the link on the SpywareBlaster page saved me some headache in guessing where it should go.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    287

    spyblaster

    Ok, I just downloaded Spyblaster 3.1 and checked enable all internet protection.

    I checked for the VB file and don't see it , but I was not prompted to run . install anything when I DL'd . I am running IE 6 with all updates . I assume everything is ok or I would have gotten a message from spywareblaster when I tried to install?

    I have a cable modem and when I conmtol ,. alt, delete, it shows that I am running Explorer . Is this IE 6? I saw some posts that it might be Windows Explorer ????
    At times , I see both Iexplore and Explorer showing up -
    As I said , I am running 98SE .
    Thanks .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •