XP vs 2000
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: XP vs 2000

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Califon, NJ
    Posts
    161

    XP vs 2000

    I need to put up 6 PCs in a peer to peer network.
    Am I better of using XP or 2000??
    Apprecaite the help
    Robin

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    hephzibah, georgia
    Posts
    473
    XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP... XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP... XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...XP...
    get the point?!
    XP is 10,000 times EASIER to setup a network in!!!
    stan...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Pac-Nor-West-Kent
    Posts
    1,344
    You would be better off in the long run using 2000. The reason for this is that XP does not have a specific server version, and 2000 does. This will make your overall support much smoother and easier to maintain. It will also give you the room in the future to expand your network as the company grows.
    The most important thing to keep in mind however is, that both XP, and Win2K are basically the same operating systems. They will both be reliable for you, but Win2K probably a bit more because of the fact that it doesn't have all the excess overhead on it. And this is better for mission critical services.

    I think that although our technology is growing, and moving fast, there is too much of a tendency to want to take the easiest way ALL the time. Sometimes the extra work up front will make it better in the long run.

    Put in the work upfront on this, and you will enjoy the fruits of your labor a lot longer in the future.

    That's my take on this issue.
    I hope it helps out some.

    ------------------
    Tech talk to me !!! PLEASE???
    Tech Talk to me !!!
    Give it UP!!!
    PLEASE???
    ASRock P4VT8+ motherboard
    Intel P4 2.4 ghz processor
    DDR 512 PC2100 RAM x 2 = 1024 MB
    2 WD 40GB JB HDD, with 8mb Cache
    1 Maxtor 60GB HDD ATA 133
    1 Maxtor 80GB HDD ATA 133
    2 Seagate SCSI 18GB 10K 8mb cache HDD
    ATI Radeon 9200SE 128mb Video card
    Onb 10/100 LAN + 3Com 10/100 PCI LAN (added for Network)
    Windows 2000 Server Operating system, (set to be used as day to day OS).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    hephzibah, georgia
    Posts
    473
    I like Win 2000 ALOT TOO!
    I am NOT a computer EXPERT by no means! What I am talking about with the network...
    I have YET to setup up a network where 95, 98.xx, or ME will "see" the 2000 and be able to access the drives! I have had ALOT of folks post replies, and I have asked a few times myself... HOW do you do it? 2000 will go down to see those O.S.'s... but I cannot get them to go up to 2000!
    I have tried the netbeui that has been suggested... and SEVERAL other permission settings... etc... NONE worked for me!
    But... with XP... it is a couple of icon clicks... and run 1 small .exe file on the Windows 9.x, and ME machines and... BAMM... Instant access to and from ANY of the O.S.'s! That is what I was talking about with my first reply!
    And... Windows 2000 is HALF the hard drive space of XP!!! AND... There is not any STUPID WPA (Windows Product Activation)!!!
    By the way... XP WPA HAS been CRACKED!!! WPA is USELESS and DEAD now!!! And... 2000 is AS stable as XP! It is EVEN faster than XP!
    SO... Please do not think I am SLAMMING 2000! Windows 2000 is AWESOME!
    By the way... My (2) Windows 2000 machines... they "see" each other just fine on the network! I just have not figured out HOW to get the 9.x and ME to see them!
    stan...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Randolph, MA
    Posts
    1,298
    Hi, I think ecrosson has said it all, and said it well.
    Regards,
    Joe

    Fiducia, sed semper veritas peto. (Trust, but always verify.)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    126
    Of course the people in this board might have a slight biasis.

    It's kinda like posting in a Chevy forum: "Which is better? Camero or Mustang?"

    My $0.02 says that both are fine. Win2K is my current OS, but folks i know using WinXP are quite happy with it.

    ------------------
    Home & Work: Win2K SP2 Free programs: Pharfruminsain.com

    [This message has been edited by MrGTI (edited 02-25-2002).]
    Using WinXP Pro SP2. ::: Grethor makes MSN Messenger 7.x on WinXP even better.


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •