Microsofts evil antics! - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Microsofts evil antics!

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,900
    If you value your PRIVACY (What you do on YOUR computer) there is EVERY GOOD REASON

    http://www.msfree.com/cached/www.hev.../microsoft.htm

    Windows 98 does not connect to Microsoft's computers. Microsoft Windows 98 runs completely independently of other computers.

    Windows XP (And all newer OSs) connect to Microsoft's computers in at least 18 ways.

    I VALUE MY PRIVACY .... MY COMPUTER IS MINE,NOT SOMEONE ELSE'S TO SNOOP ON @ WILL!!
    Last edited by Dude111; December 20th, 2011 at 12:35 PM.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern ON Canada
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by Dude111 View Post
    If you value your PRIVACY (What you do on YOUR computer) there is EVERY GOOD REASON

    http://www.msfree.com/cached/www.hev.../microsoft.htm




    I VALUE MY PRIVACY .... MY COMPUTER IS MINE,NOT SOMEONE ELSE'S TO SNOOP ON @ WILL!!
    I was just thinking that with all the security holes on your set up ( IE6 and all), that just about anyone can snoop on it alt will. I could be wrong...

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    26,544
    Ironically the home page of that anti Windows XP and Microsoft diatribe, on which there is just that one article that doesn't recommend XP, has 10 articles on why you shouldn't use Internet Explorer.. and most of those are referring to newer and even more secure versions than IEX6. In fact the only operating system they recommend is Ubuntu (which does not come with IEX at all).

    http://www.msfree.com/

    Also, looking at the website of Michael Jennings, the person who wrote that singular anti XP article, I see no indication of his credentials as a computer or computer security expert.

    http://www.futurepower.org/index.html
    _____________________
    cat lovers click here

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,900
    But what he says is quite true my friend! (And very strong)

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida
    Posts
    837
    There is no way a firewall protected OS can call home unless the user agrees. Period!

    The key here is firewall protected. Firewalls protect traffic going in both directions - inbound and outbound. I don't know of anyone who hasn't used a firewall during the past 15 years or so.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Southern ON Canada
    Posts
    442
    I'm still not understanding old outdated software supported by old outdated articles. Today's OS' and software are so much better, it isn't a close contest for the home user. Glad my friends and family have moved on to the new software; saves me a lot of headaches.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Friern Barnet, London, England
    Posts
    46,565
    Quote Originally Posted by cdroman View Post
    I'm still not understanding old outdated software supported by old outdated articles. Today's OS' and software are so much better, it isn't a close contest for the home user. Glad my friends and family have moved on to the new software; saves me a lot of headaches.
    You would probably have to be paranoid yourself for it to make any sense
    Nick.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •