"Best" E-Mail Client?
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: "Best" E-Mail Client?

  1. January 20th, 2007, 10:49 PM #1
    MrDoomMaster's Avatar
    MrDoomMaster
    MrDoomMaster is offline C++ Programmer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    107

    "Best" E-Mail Client?

    If I were to approach each of you and ask what is your preferred or recommended email client, what would you say?
    --MrDoomMaster
    --Win32/MFC/DirectX C++ Programmer
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. January 21st, 2007, 12:19 AM #2
    jmtjet's Avatar
    jmtjet
    jmtjet is offline I,ooo,oooth poster
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Ogdensburg,NY USA
    Posts
    4,535
    Evolution.(Ubuntu Linux ) Otherwise. Gmail.
    The true test of character is not how much we
    know how to do, but how we behave when we don't know what to do
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. January 21st, 2007, 12:28 AM #3
    K G G's Avatar
    K G G
    K G G is offline Virtual Patient
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NW of Houston
    Posts
    2,855
    Well... probably not the Best (technically), but certainly one that Most people are able to use and therefore giving you a broad range of options and inter-activity is Outlook 2003.

    We use it at work in a very large international company and global address lists, calendars etc are very useful and effective tools. Thus I chose to use the same at home - no need to learn two apps.

    My 2¢ worth
    KGG
    Last edited by K G G; January 21st, 2007 at 12:30 AM. Reason: spelling...
    Nimo N152B (AMD R5, W11H) and plenty of other legacy systems :-)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. January 21st, 2007, 12:41 AM #4
    x71s8zTN
    x71s8zTN is offline Virtual Resident
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Strasburg, VA
    Posts
    510
    Outlook has the reputation of being the best. My friends who are still working swear by it. It is expensive and too much software for me.
    For personal use, having tried Poco Mail, Eudora, Outlook Express and Pegasus I always end up coming back to Thunderbird. It is free and has sufficient features for private use - no mail lists or bulk mail sending.
    1. Dimension C521; Athlon64x2; 3.25 GHz RAM; 320GB HD; 256MB Radeon X 1300 PRO ; Windows 7 PRO - 32 bit; Windows Security Essentials; Firefox v3; MS Live Mail; MalwareBytes Antimalware.
    2. Studio XPS 7100;Studio Phenom II X61055T 2.8GHz;8 GB RAM;Radeon HD 5450;1 TB HD;Windows 7 PRO- 64 bit; Windows Security Essentials;Malwarebytes Antimalware; MS LIve Mail; Firefox v4; Acronis True Image 2011, RollBack.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. January 21st, 2007, 01:36 AM #5
    HAN's Avatar
    HAN
    HAN is offline Virtual PC Specialist!!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,319
    I agree that in a business environment, Outlook is tough to beat. But at home, I wanted something smaller, simpler. I tried several programs and ended up with Thunderbird.

    It's similar to Outlook Express, so it's easy to switch and begin using T-Bird. One big advantage T-Bird brings is a superior spam filter. After a few days of training, it works amazing well...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. January 21st, 2007, 01:39 AM #6
    K G G's Avatar
    K G G
    K G G is offline Virtual Patient
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NW of Houston
    Posts
    2,855
    Yep - Outlook does not come with a SpamFilter.
    I installed SpamBayes (a reco from VDr) - works excellent for me
    Nimo N152B (AMD R5, W11H) and plenty of other legacy systems :-)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. January 21st, 2007, 03:02 AM #7
    eddds40's Avatar
    eddds40
    eddds40 is offline Virtual Resident
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    central USA
    Posts
    758
    Was orginaly Netscape went to Thunderbird been their ever since and Like it. I did go see what version of outlook was on pc and it was 2002 I have never ran outlook or outlook express on one of my own machines Was wondering if 2002 was near or close to good email program as 2003 that some in here seem to like?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. January 21st, 2007, 03:19 AM #8
    K G G's Avatar
    K G G
    K G G is offline Virtual Patient
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    NW of Houston
    Posts
    2,855
    Anything from Outlook 2000 on is a good version IMO.
    Nimo N152B (AMD R5, W11H) and plenty of other legacy systems :-)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. January 21st, 2007, 03:57 AM #9
    MrDoomMaster's Avatar
    MrDoomMaster
    MrDoomMaster is offline C++ Programmer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    107
    If you guys haven't tried Outlook 2007... Don't waste your time. It's terrible. They've noobed up the interface so it's completely different. I really hate it.

    I agree that Outlook 2003 was the best, and I really quite enjoyed it. But regardless of what version of Outlook you talk about, they're all bloatware. I really hate the additional features. I never use them!

    I am currently using Thunderbird (as of today) and I really like it. It's simple, and gets the job done.
    --MrDoomMaster
    --Win32/MFC/DirectX C++ Programmer
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. January 21st, 2007, 05:44 AM #10
    und3rtak3r
    und3rtak3r is offline Virtual Intern
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    156
    In the Business Win2k3 AD server enviroment Outlook 2003.

    One of my contracts use Lotus Notes.. secure, and so long as the server is happy as stable as a brick, clunky as hell and a pain in the.....

    At home Gmail, Thunderbird.. and just installed SeaMonkey to give it a blast
    Last edited by und3rtak3r; January 21st, 2007 at 05:47 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. January 21st, 2007, 06:22 AM #11
    crunchie's Avatar
    crunchie
    crunchie is offline Single dad
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Mandurah, Western Australia
    Posts
    10,157
    Opera . Catch is that you have to have the browser too as the email client is built in.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. January 21st, 2007, 09:23 AM #12
    fink's Avatar
    fink
    fink is offline Site Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    26,544
    "the Bat" http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/

    Small, fast and extremely configurable. Also very secure.
    _____________________
    cat lovers click here
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. January 21st, 2007, 10:24 AM #13
    liam858's Avatar
    liam858
    liam858 is offline Virtual PC Specialist!!!
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    North West England.
    Posts
    9,568
    Thunderbird.


    Liam
    Desktop:I5 2500K|Asus P8Z68-V|8GB Corsair Vengeance|1280MB Nvidia 560 TI PE|1TB Seagate/60GB OCZ SSD|LG Blu-ray Writer|Corsair 750W
    27" iMac:I5 2500S|12GB Crucial DDR3|ATI 1GB 6970|1TB|Superdrive|Mighty Mouse
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules