Very inetersting stuff guys. Nothing like some good conspiracy theories to start off the week.
I must say that the videos are quite convincing, but the author is not, making it souns very political when saying things like "crummy military" and in general bashing the govenment.
Don't forget, that there is no shortage of f conspiracy video, many of them convincing but not true.
I don't know what to believe, but I am convinced that we'll never really know. At least in our life times.
why would our gov. go to all that trouble, they dont have to explain anything to us anyway,
i personally dont believe that video at all.
One point I haven't heard yet is if the government is lying about this why didn't they plant evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
For those who remember Lee Harvey Oswald was a lousey shot but apparently somone from a higher power gave him a magic bullet. ;)
It was from the grassy knoll DOH!
As to the Pentagon I watched a very well made program on Sky yesterday afternoon all about the crash and rebuild work that went on including interviews by the chief engineer and videos of the damage caused to the building.It appears the plane crashed into section one of the Pentagon at first floor level with a lower port wing crashing into the ground just on impact thus burying itself a meter or two underground where it was later found.
Section one was the only section that had so far been fitted with the up to date sprinkler system which provided twice the normal capacity of a standard system.This and the expansion joints built into the sections of the building during the 60s is promoted as saving many more lives.
The sprinklers by keeping the fires at bay long enough for many survivors from the floors directly above where the plane entered the building to escape in the intense heat and choking smoke.
The saving feature of the expansion joints can be seen when the section dramatical collapses to the ground some eight or nine minutes after the crash as a clean break between section one and two of the building just like a slice has been cut from a cake.
Another feature that saved many lives and removed much of the impact was the tubular design of the steel retaining bars in the concrete pillars which although struck retained the inner concrete long enough to hold the floors up for many minutes after the impact occurred.A design which he said was no longer used so had it been a modern building the pillars would have lost all their strength immediately.
I've heard several interesting theories, but can't say what I believe...
Here's a link http://www.911inplanesite.com that follows and goes with the same idea regarding the Pentagon. I've not seen the movie that the site sells, but I listened to the author of the video and he's got some very interesting stuff...
911 In Plane Site
The FIRST 911 Video to Present VIDEO EVIDENCE - NOT THEORIES
http://www.911inplanesite.com/911trailer.html
Well a very interesting couple of hours reading and I'm barely scratching the surface.
Who knows what t believe any more.