I have been reading up on the Google/Verizon guidelines issued today regarding net neutrality. I smell a rat...
On the surface it reads like Google supports neutrality, but once you dig into the details and loopholes, it looks like Google would go along with a creation of a "new internet" with no neutrality....while allowing the real internet to become a slum over the years. Further, no neutrality for wireless....which is the future of net communication.
Anyone else feel like Google has finally shown themselves to NOT be the net neutrality heros they played themselves to be?
Ars Technica asks, "How large a truck could you drive through these loopholes?"
http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/...government.ars
Wired says, "But if Google’s and Verizon’s proposal goes through, we really would have two internets — one free, where Google pledges to stay, another paid, where services such as 3D television, remote medical procedures, and bandwidth-intensive games appear — for a price."
http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2010/...nternets/all/1
I made a comic for the occasion:
http://www.omnimaxx.com/hotlink/horton.jpg

