Quote:
the point of the dually's running at 400mhz a piece is to run them both at 400x2 to give it a 800Mhz increase.
Actually that is neither the point or the effect of running a dual channel memory configuration. Running dual channel does not increase the bandwidth of each channel (each would still run at an effective rate of 400mhz here). Nor is there a combining of the individual bandwidths of each channel in to what would be equivalent to an an 800mhz effective bandwidth. The actual/real benefit of dual channel is no wheres even close to what a true doubling of available memory bandwidth would acheive. What dual channel does do is allow certain memory operations to overlap and happen simultaneously. Essentially it allows a memory read operations to be occurring on one memory channel at the same time the setup for another memory read (not a read, just the operation to setup a memory read) is occurring on the other memory channel. Normally (in single channel mode) these two operations would need to be queued and happen in a single-threaded fashion. There is a benefit to the dual-channel opertaion, but it is not a doubling of memory performance. The "real world" benefit is like 15% at best, and more likely in the realm of maybe half this. That's not to say it is worthless, just not as big a deal as one might think.