Physical security of an Ethernet port
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Physical security of an Ethernet port

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Newport, De
    Posts
    44

    Physical security of an Ethernet port

    I work for a very large company that has many contractors that come in and out of the building. We are looking for a way to allow the contractors to come in with their laptops but to prevent them from plugging their laptop into any availible ethernet port. One of the suggestions was to find out if anyone out there makes a lock that you can slide into the Ethernet port on the laptop and lock it so that they can not plug a cable into it. Does anyone know if something like this does exist or not. Please help if possible.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,107
    Usually, I'm a big fan of physical security. But seriously, if your IT guy proposed this, you should fire him and get a new IT guy.
    Installing these locks (if they even exist) would only give you a false sense of security. Stick with usernames and passwords. Computers are getting smaller and smaller... I could sneak in a PDA and still access data. What if you want to go wireless in the future? What if I just hide a PCI card in my pocket and install it once I'm in the building?
    Strange security measures usually only attract attention, anyway.
    ___________________________________________

    I'm a cinematographer and director of photography in Milwaukee.
    I use Windows, OSX, and 40 TB of storage to tell stories with my
    Sony FS7 | Panasonic GH4 | 5D mark III
    Find me on Google + | Facebook | Twitter

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    230
    The whole idea is a little strange, but it's wierd that you'd consider putting the "lock" on the laptop and not the ethernet jacks. They aren't your laptops and what's to stop anyone from using another device.

    Anyways you'd be much better off by using VLANs and authentication like 802.1x. Depending on your setup and requirements there could be other solutions (captive portal for instance), but this is generaly considered the proper way to do it.

    If you want to actually physically disable the ethernet jacks there are products made for this. They are used in hotels, restaurants, etc. to physically limit access to the network. I'll see if I can find a link.
    CataclysmCow

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Newport, De
    Posts
    44
    I agree with everything that is being said but we are working as an outsourcing company and the company has stated that they want every jack available in the building to everyone that has a computer. Due to this we cannot disable the unused jacks we are attempting to work within the confines of the operating companies requirements. This is the best solution we can come up with in a short time frame. Everyone who enters the building is searched and any electronic products that they bring in are subject to network security requirements such as anti-virus, patches etc. However some of these laptops are not up to date with these patches and anti-virus and we are attempting to allow them in the building but prevent them from being on our network. This is the reason for looking for these types of locks. It is only a temp solution to the problem until we can get the operating company to approve us putting in a more permanent solution.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ann Arbor MI
    Posts
    134
    Passwords are ok, but why let an unauthorized user gain even that much access.
    Cisco switches can be setup to allow only the MAC address registered with the administrator to enter your network fabric. Stop them at layer two.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    1,107
    Very Smart, AKP. I think I should have suggested that option first.
    It's tough to deal with clients that don't know what they're asking for. Good luck!
    ___________________________________________

    I'm a cinematographer and director of photography in Milwaukee.
    I use Windows, OSX, and 40 TB of storage to tell stories with my
    Sony FS7 | Panasonic GH4 | 5D mark III
    Find me on Google + | Facebook | Twitter

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    19
    I was going to suggest MAC filtering in this situation. You can either configure it in that situation at the switch level, or you can simply set the DHCP server in your network to only assign IP addresses to recognized hosts. From there, you should implement a proxy on your network so contractors could not get outside. I can quite easily see how if you're running a domain, a proxy, and MAC filtering, you would be in very good shape.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    10,060
    The physical lock is not going to work in the long as its possible to use a pre asigned outlet with little effort on the transgressors part.The MAC blocking is a good alternative and/or the provision of connections external to your network and blocked by your internal server and firewall.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •