-
February 10th, 2004, 08:18 AM
#1
W2K/XP Speed Tweak
W2K & XP speed tweak.
Hey ppl.
Try this tip I found off of a website.
It makes Internet & Windows Explorer incredibly fast.
Windows Explorer opens up almost instantly now!!!
Here it is:
Here's a great tip to speed up your browsing of Windows 2000 & XP machines. Its actually a fix to a bug that by default of a normal Windows 2000 setup that scans shared files for Scheduled Tasks. And its turns out that you can experience a delay as long as 30 seconds when you try to view shared files across a network as Windows 2000 is using the extra time to search the Remote Computer for any Scheduled Tasks. Note that though the fix is originally intended for only those affected, Windows 2000 & XP users will experience that actual browsing speed of both the Internet & Windows Explorers improving significantly after applying it since it doesnt search for Scheduled Tasks anymore. Here's how :
Open up the Registry and go to :
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/Microsoft/Windows/Current Version/Explorer/RemoteComputer/NameSpace
Under that branch, select the key :
{D6277990-4C6A-11CF-8D87-00AA0060F5BF}
Right click it and select "Delete".
I did this after a reformat & it smokes now!!!! 4 weeks now with zero adverse affects that I have noticed.
-
February 13th, 2004, 11:03 AM
#2
Come on guys, a little feed back.
-
February 13th, 2004, 11:17 AM
#3
I can't find any information on the MSKB about this? Where did you hear this? A link would be nice too?
If no one is responding I would guess people don't like deleting stuff from the reg. without verifacation links etc.
If you ask for help from the forum, PLEASE take the time to let us know the results so we can all learn.
THE MICK
My system specs...
THE ES - 5,120 (640 8-way nodes) 500 MHz NEC CPUs. 8 GFLOPS per CPU (41 TFLOPS total). 2 GB (4 512 MB FPLRAM modules) per CPU (10 TB total) shared memory inside the node. 640 × 640 crossbar switch between the nodes with 16 GB/s inter-node bandwidth, using 20 kVA power consumption per node
The machine runs a version of the Super-UX UNIX-based OS. You mean it's not running Windows???
-
February 13th, 2004, 11:42 AM
#4
Yes it works for W9x, too!
Saw this tweak on another site, too. It really does work on W9x systems. You definitely notice a difference with dialup!!
Cyber
-
February 13th, 2004, 01:04 PM
#5
No worries. Here is one. If you want more, copy the text & run a search in google.
-
February 13th, 2004, 03:39 PM
#6
Double check
I think this is the same place I got my information. I have a hardcopy printed, but will check this later when I have time. I will post it to see if it is the same, okay?
Cyber
-
February 13th, 2004, 10:38 PM
#7
Hi, this has been around for quite a while, and we have had discussions about it before. This is the link you are quoting from:-
http://www.winxpcentral.com/windows2...eedup-2000.php
It is mentioned on many sites and recommended by many. Now I don't see any reason not to apply it. I have it applied on my 2k machines even though it makes no difference since it only effects network traffic .
-
February 13th, 2004, 10:51 PM
#8
Originally posted by jenae
Hi, this has been around for quite a while, and we have had discussions about it before. This is the link you are quoting from:-
http://www.winxpcentral.com/windows2...eedup-2000.php
It is mentioned on many sites and recommended by many. Now I don't see any reason not to apply it. I have it applied on my 2k machines even though it makes no difference since it only effects network traffic .
Cool, but it was new to me.
-
February 14th, 2004, 04:14 AM
#9
-
February 14th, 2004, 08:43 AM
#10
OK, I just tried this on a XP Pro system after feeling that I had a good enough system backup and a reg backup too.
After saving that key here is what I got...
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\RemoteComputer\NameSpace\{D6277990-4C6A-11CF-8D87-00AA0060F5BF}]
@="Scheduled Tasks"
So, I guess it really did have to do with scheduled tasks!
But I see no speed improvement with IE on the internet at all.
As far as opening up explorer faster... It appears no faster to me on 2 of my servers.
I guess it may work on a system that is on a dial up???
Last edited by THE MICK; February 14th, 2004 at 08:45 AM.
If you ask for help from the forum, PLEASE take the time to let us know the results so we can all learn.
THE MICK
My system specs...
THE ES - 5,120 (640 8-way nodes) 500 MHz NEC CPUs. 8 GFLOPS per CPU (41 TFLOPS total). 2 GB (4 512 MB FPLRAM modules) per CPU (10 TB total) shared memory inside the node. 640 × 640 crossbar switch between the nodes with 16 GB/s inter-node bandwidth, using 20 kVA power consumption per node
The machine runs a version of the Super-UX UNIX-based OS. You mean it's not running Windows???
-
February 14th, 2004, 09:24 AM
#11
I viewed this thread when it was first posted and remembered that I had a slow network problem about a year and a half ago and it was cured with the very same fix as crunchie gave (my thanks to DrMDJ), and yes it did speed up my network. Since then I have had to redo my system a few times and this is one of the very first tweaks I do after the new system is up 'n running.
Remember, whenever you delete a registry key ALWAYS BACK IT UP.
Hope this clears things up a bit..........
Please post back so others can benefit also........
Later
John Steven
"The only stupid question is the one you don't ask"
-
February 16th, 2004, 01:54 PM
#12
Yup, this is a good tweak, but i don't think it's for people with just one PC... I think this tweak is only useful for PC's on a LAN... i've used this tweak myself ever since Win 2000 and it's been very rewarding, it makes searching/browsing PC's in network neighbourhood very much faster...
I don't bother going directly into REGEDIT to do this tweak, i've created a *.reg file with all the keys that i always add and delete from XP's registry, then at any time, just one click on the *.reg file and all is done for me... I also include my *.reg file in my custom unattended XP install and it's all done automatically...
"Computer says no"
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|