[RESOLVED] Another MS Windows Update BUG
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: [RESOLVED] Another MS Windows Update BUG

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Largo, Fl.
    Posts
    22,332

    Resolved [RESOLVED] Another MS Windows Update BUG

    KB3013455 - is known to cause display issues on Vista and Windows Server 2003.

    My developers have spent two days troubleshooting an issue...when along comes another client in a different state with the same issue.

    OH - more information..... Thus with the help of my Data Center support guys - they sent me this:
    http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/foru...onts-look-bad/
    If you're happy and you know it......it's your meds.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    25,458
    Microsoft surreptitiously reissues KB 3013455 for Vista, Windows Server 2003


    http://www.infoworld.com/article/288...rver-2003.html

    VirtualDr email notices are not working.
    Check back regularly for responses.

    _____________________
    cat lovers click here

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Largo, Fl.
    Posts
    22,332
    Thanks... And in my case - with all the troubleshooting we did - we might have killed the machine to the point of needing to reimage it.

    I think I'll find a tall bridge and jump.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    18,087
    Thanks for the info. I have a Vista system to patch that may be affected.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM USA
    Posts
    14,686
    KB3013455 apparently does not adversely affect Windows operating systems other than those mentioned--Vista and Windows Server 2003.
    Jim
    WIN7 Ultimate SP1 64bit, IE 11, NTFS,
    cable, MS Security Essentials, Windows 7 firewall

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Largo, Fl.
    Posts
    22,332
    Actually it's XP, Vista, Win Server 2003 and 2008...
    If you're happy and you know it......it's your meds.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 1999
    Location
    Largo, Fl.
    Posts
    22,332
    I wish I had dug a little deeper last week. Before we found out about the update bug, we uninstalled our accounting software and it took all day to get the machine back up and running.

    The patch to fix the update is here and it works.
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/3037639

    But if you uninstalled the bad boy KB 3013455 you have to install it before running the patch.
    If you're happy and you know it......it's your meds.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    18,087
    They still don't have KB3033929 right either:

    http://www.zdnet.com/article/more-mi...tag=TRE17cfd61

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 1998
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    25,458
    This is what MS says about KB3033929:

    Known issues with this security update
    Issue 1

    Some users cannot install this security update if their computers meet the following conditions:

    Have a multiple-boot configuration of Windows and various distributions of Linux
    Use a non-Windows boot loader
    Have Windows and Linux installed on separate drives

    We have been able to verify that systems that have the Windows boot loader enabled as the primary loader are successfully able to install this update and that systems that have a non-Windows boot loader specified as the primary boot loader cannot install the update, even if the user uses that loader to select Windows.

    Issue 1 workaround

    To work around that issue, you can either use Windows as the default boot loader or you can change your BIOS settings to enable the Windows boot loader directly when you install this update.
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3033929

    Clearly that warning wasn't there when it was initially released.

    Time was when I wouldn't have to wait to install updates to see if they caused problems then it changed to me deciding to wait 2 or 3 days to install them now I see I have to wait longer than a week. Inexcusable for this to happen so often.

    VirtualDr email notices are not working.
    Check back regularly for responses.

    _____________________
    cat lovers click here

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Location
    Sheboygan, WI
    Posts
    53,392
    I wondered when that would happen. And they wonder why some of use are using linux almost full time.
    Family Tree Maker, my scanner, are not ported to Linux yet.
    And clients are still scared of it.

    Code:
    $ inxi -Fxz
    System:    Host: antix15 Kernel: 3.19.1-antix.1-486-smp i686 (32 bit gcc: 4.9.2)
               Desktop: IceWM 1.3.8
               Distro: antiX-15-beta1-V_386-full Killah P 16 March 2015
    Machine:   System: TOSHIBA product: Satellite A505D v: PSAQ0U-00C002
               Mobo: TOSHIBA model: Portable PC
               Bios: Insyde v: 1.40 date: 06/08/2009
    CPU:       Dual core AMD Turion X2 Mobile RM-72 (-MCP-) cache: 1024 KB
               flags: (lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 svm) bmips: 8396
               clock speeds: max: 2100 MHz 1: 1050 MHz 2: 2100 MHz
    Graphics:  Card: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] RS780MC [Mobility Radeon HD 3100]
               bus-ID: 01:05.0
               Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: ati,radeon (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
               Resolution: 1366x768@60.00hz
               GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on AMD RS780
               GLX Version: 3.0 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Rendering: Yes
    Audio:     Card Advanced Micro Devices [AMD/ATI] SBx00 Azalia (Intel HDA)
               driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:14.2
               Sound: ALSA v: k3.19.1-antix.1-486-smp
    Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL8192E/RTL8192SE Wireless LAN Controller
               driver: rtl819xE port: 6000 bus-ID: 02:00.0
               IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
               Card-2: Realtek RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller
               driver: r8169 v: 2.3LK-NAPI port: 4000 bus-ID: 03:00.0
               IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
    Drives:    HDD Total Size: 256.1GB (2.3% used)
               ID-1: /dev/sda model: TOSHIBA_THNSNJ25 size: 256.1GB
    Partition: ID-1: / size: 24G used: 3.0G (14%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
               ID-2: swap-1 size: 2.91GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda2
    Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 58.5C mobo: N/A
               Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
    Info:      Processes: 111 Uptime: 1:39 Memory: 307.4/3287.2MB
               Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.9.2
               Client: Shell (bash 4.3.301) inxi: 2.2.19

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •